Unique images encountered on scanned pages in 2026-W29, deduplicated by URL and Alt — the same image reused across pages with the same explanation is one row. Images with alternate captions are split into separate rows.
Image alt-text coverage across 570 page(s) scanned in 2026-W29.
Category
Count
Share
Total image occurrences
607
—
Unique images
41
—
Has alt text
58
10%
Decorative (alt="")
541
89%
Missing alt attribute
8
1%
Alt-text quality
Beyond present-vs-missing, each unique image's alt text is classified for quality. Filenames, redundant phrasing ("image of…"), and too-short or too-long values are technically present but unhelpful — the cases a human should rewrite. Decorative and "looks good" are not problems.
Alt-text quality across 41 unique image(s).
Verdict
Images
Share
What it means
Missing alt
2
5%
No alt attribute — a screen reader may announce the filename.
Redundant / meaningless
1
2%
Phrases like "image of…" or bare values like "photo" add nothing.
Too long
3
7%
So long it probably belongs in a caption or a separate description.
Looks good
13
32%
Present, plausible, no red flags (still worth a human spot-check).
Decorative
22
54%
alt="" or aria-hidden — intentionally not announced. Not a problem.
Image detail
Up to 500 unique image occurrences from 570 page(s) scanned, most-reused first. — click a column heading to sort